A single number for how much a place gives the nervous system what it was built to need — read across six channels.
The Sensorial Choice Score is our attempt to put a number on something the industry has been content to leave vague: whether a place is actually doing anything for the animal standing in it. Not whether it photographs well. Whether it feeds the nervous system the conditions two and a half million years of evolution taught it to expect. We read that across six channels — the air you breathe, the light you keep time by, the sound around you, the heat and the way the air moves, the nature in view and within reach, and the living world in the soil. Each is a pathway to a body, not a landscape feature: soil, water, planting, and shade are inputs to those channels, not the channels themselves.
The composite is a single number from 0 to 100, and we say plainly what it is: provisional, not a validated index — a working rubric we publish openly so it can be read, used, and argued with. A standard that needs a license isn't one. Every property we read gets a score. Every property we build is designed to raise it.
The modern built environment quietly degrades the very signals the body evolved to read as safety: it fouls the air, floods the night with light and the day with traffic noise, traps heat, strips the green out of view, and paves over the living soil the immune system used to meet. The result is a deficit you can feel and, until now, couldn't name. The Score names it. You cannot fix what you refuse to measure, and you cannot sell "a little better" to someone who has no idea how bad it was.
A free property read returns your Sensorial Choice Score and where the gains are hiding — air, light, noise, thermal, nature, microbiome.
Get a free read → Or see how it's built into the work — the projects →